pantantrollo

Members
  • Content count

    474
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

149 Excellent

About pantantrollo

  • Rank
    Junior Mage

Profile Information

  • Gender Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

5,322 profile views
  1. maxthon support needed

    It may also be a problem attributable to IDM and its integration. Try to see if the same thing happens with any of the portable versions of the series 5.3.8.xxx, which have a more modern chrome core.
  2. Problem (Solved)

    That's okay As I said in general it works, but sometimes it fails. You just have to hit the cross to close the banner, possibly next time it will not come out :-)
  3. The matter is quite serious. In addition, and already commented here in the past, all those URLs are sent to the maxthon servers (without knowing exactly what they do with them), If we have checked the box "Enable secure URL scan.This helps protect the browser and local machine against unsafe websites ", that basically we have to have it activated, because if not, we can not see the ssl certificates of the web that we visited, with what we are almost" forced "to have it activated. I already asked in a comment that this be separated, but there is no way they want or understand this. I repeat, @BugSir006, why to see the ssl certificates that any other browser offers me, I have to Yes or YES, activate this option in maxthon about the sending of URLs in the options?
  4. Problem (Solved)

    That happens because the core of maxthon is already something old, 61.x. For example with the latest beta version of maxthon of the series 5.3.8.x, that notice will not appear, since this version has nucleus 69.x (if I remember correctly. To partially solve this warning, as you have done, is editing the User-Agent. In this thread below you will have the right one.
  5. netflix not working again

    About the screenshot of maxthon, (which together with the user / passwd that are in maxthon), what is still retaining me in this browser (and the way of working, everything has to be said :-)) Ucbrowser: It takes almost a clone (or not better) screen grabber. Cent_browser: It also has a utility similar to that of maxhon "screenshot.exe" (958 kb). I use it as an alternative to maxthon. Mye9: Another that carries a utility of the same style as the previous ones, "SnapShot.exe" (706 kb) These are the ones that I have found and capture panatalla "outside" the browser, like maxthon. What they are implementing in the other browsers, at least until what I have seen, they only capture inside the window of the navigator, which does not work for me. For the rest, I agree on the subject of vivaldi as an alternative and Opera (its vpn and the flow attract me quite a lot). And of mathon, I would miss, apart from the screenshot, the related to the management of the video playback
  6. I did a browser security test.

    Totally agree, In my case, the same, for web in the relations with the public administration, regulated training and financial entities, I no longer use maxthon, in some cases, as I have already commented, why it fails, (version yes, version no) its management with the electronic certificates, with what I finish tired of being trying. In other cases, because I do not know what kind of security is being resolved, if we have old blink kernels with respect to the competition of at least 6 months to a year You do not have the possibility of having some of the most famous extensions, both in chrome nuclei, such as quatum (or gecko), with which at the end maxthon limps again And I could continue with the theme of its development, slow, bad, without paying attention to who is dedicating free time (those present here) to try to improve both the corrections and the implementations of features that would make it more appropriate against others competitors Sincerely I foresee (I imagine as many), the disappearance of maxthon, in fact every time these forums are less and less traveled by those who previously roamed here , a pity
  7. I did a browser security test.

    If at any time they decided to support the extensions of chrome and its "flags", we could have it easier.
  8. I did a browser security test.

    Put the links at least, so we do not have to be looking https://panopticlick.eff.org I have tried with some other browser, and they have practically the same results. In the end it all depends on the type of extensions you add, so you can change "Something", but not much. For example, firefox without protections, only with the own configuration Vivaldi, for choosing another blink engine
  9. Browsers Does not work or works badly: Maxthon 5.3.8.600, 5.2.7.2200 and .2300 Browsers YES it works: Maxthon 5.2.7.2000 and 2100, 5.3.8.500 and Latest Versions of: Opera, Vivaldi, Edge Dev, Edge Canary, Edge (official), Avast Browser, IEeplorer 11, Chromiun,
  10. Folder length very short maxnote

    Same 4.9.x. If you come dragging the favorites from older versions like me. If once the favorites are transferred to the 5.x series, you decide to export them and then import them, you lose the lengths in the folders of more than 30 that you had in maxthon 4.9.xxx
  11. Do you have a Autofirma installed? if it is not impossible to call it With Opera 60, perfect (as with previous versions of maxthon as I mentioned above) With maxthon 5.2.7.2300, it remains waiting, after clicking on "simulate signature" (it recognizes it as chrome 61, and it does not matter if the user agent changes, in case someone comments) With 5.3.8.600 the whole page disappears
  12. Please, of all that I have exposed, can you tell me what you CAN NOT confirm? I understand then that for you yes has worked with the versions mentioned above in the post. Can you put a screenshot or a video that shows what works for you?
  13. Folder length very short maxnote

    It should be considered a bug, because if markers are imported from other browsers, the text is cut to 30 characters. I do not think the change is so complicated. Change a number?
  14. Nobody takes me into account !

    I think they have enough to fix all the bugs that are currently in the series 5.2.7.xxx and 5.3.8.xxx
  15. In the new portable versions, 5.3.8.600, as in 5.2.7.2200 and .2300, the access for the signature with electronic certificates has been spoiled again. With the latest beta version, the 5.3.8.600, if you press simulate signature, the page disappears. In the other mentioned versions, 5.2.7.2200 and .2300 , you are thinking indefinitely. https://www.ae.jcyl.es/reqae2/ The versions, 5.2.7.2000 and 2.100, and the 5.3.8.500 work well Nota: In particular, it seems that the problem is more in the signature with the certificate (since it seems that it calls an applet), than in the detection of the certificate in the warehouse. From this address, also, v5.3.8.600, the page is deleted. The versions of the series 5.2.7.2200 and .2300 seem to have a hard time making the applet jump https://valide.redsara.es/valide/validarCertificado/ejecutar.html